The Carlisle Times

Est. 2011

0 notes

To the Sacramento set, this seems to be a perfectly logical choice. They’re certainly not going to make any hard choices that might upset the house of cards they’ve balanced precariously atop the wants and needs of well-funded special interests.

Indeed, if Californians believed anything anyone in Sacramento said about anything, they might be willing to crack open their wallets and experience more pain for the good of the state. This was last attempted during a special election in 2009, and it too failed. At least that effort had a reform attached to it. This time, it’s just threats.

We Californians, though, are wise to the scam. If we give them more money, our kids’ classes won’t get smaller, the schools overall won’t improve and when they graduate from high school their chances of getting into a UC school will still be slim (and more expensive at that).
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2012/06/28/californias_catch-22_higher_taxes_or_fewer_school_days_114637.html

Filed under california taxes politics

1 note

"Among 35 major national publications, including <em>The New York Times</em> and <em>The Wall Street Journal,</em> men had 81 percent of the quotes in stories about abortion, the research group said Thursday, while women had 12 percent and organizations had 7 percent. In stories about birth control, men scored 75 percent of the quotes, with women getting 19 percent and organizations getting 6 percent. Stories about Planned Parenthood had a similar ratio, with men getting 67 percent, women getting 26 percent, and organizations getting 7 percent."

changetheratio:

From The Daily Beast, by Abigail Pesta: “Men Rule Media Coverage of Women’s News.”

Men didn’t just dominate stories on women’s issues, the study found, but stories on all election topics, including the economy and foreign policy. Among individual publications, men had 65 percent of quotes on general election topics in The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and the Chicago Tribune. Men had 67 percent of quotes in The Washington Post and 76 percent in USA Today. 

Men ruled the airwaves as well. The study looked at 11 major national television shows, finding that men had 81 percent of quotes on general election topics. Among individual shows, men were quoted 87 percent of the time on CNN State of the Union, 81 percent of the time on Hardball, 78 percent on Face the Nation, 77 percent on Fox News Special Report, and 69 percent on Meet the Press.

And they wonder why we called it “Change The Ratio.” <sound of head bonking repeatedly against a wall. Ow.>

Filed under election politics women

14 notes

Erin Tao: I Don't Care If You Like It

erintao:

My goodness, I wish I could take credit for writing this. But alas. More importantly: ladies, do your thing. And don’t care if they like it.

(From Tina Fey’s Bossypants, which easily qualifies as a must-read for every ambitious woman with a relative sense of humor:)

“Amy Poehler was new to SNL and we were all crowded into the seventeenth-floor writers’ room, waiting for the Wednesday read-through to start. There were always a lot of noisy ‘comedy bits’ going on in that room. Amy was in the middle of some such nonsense with Seth Meyers across the table, and she did something vulgar as a joke. I can’t remember what it was exactly, except it was dirty and loud and ‘unladylike.’ Jimmy Fallon, who was arguably the star of the show at the time, turned to her and in a faux-squeamish voice said: ‘Stop that! It’s not cute! I don’t like it.’ Amy dropped what she was doing, went black in the eyes for a second, and wheeled around on him. ‘I don’t fucking care if you like it.’ Jimmy was visibly startled. Amy went right back to enjoying her ridiculous bit. (I should make it clear that Jimmy and Amy are very good friends and there was never any real beef between them. Insert penis joke here.)

With that exchange, a cosmic shift took place. Amy made it clear that she wasn’t there to be cute. She wasn’t there to play wives and girlfriends in the boys’ scenes. She was there to do what she wanted to do and she did not fucking care if you like it. I was so happy. Weirdly, I remember thinking, ‘My friend is here! My friend is here!’ Even though things had been going great for me at the show, with Amy there, I felt less alone.

I think of this whenever someone says to me, ‘Jerry Lewis says women aren’t funny,’ or ‘Christopher Hitchens says women aren’t funny,’ or ‘Rick Fenderman says women aren’t funny. … Do you have anything to say to that?’

Yes. We don’t fucking care if you like it.

I don’t say it out loud, of course, because Jerry Lewis is a great philanthropist, Hitchens is very sick, and the third guy I made up. Unless one of these men is my boss, which none of them is, it’s irrelevant. My hat goes off to them. It’s an impressively arrogant move to conclude that just because you don’t like something, it is empirically not good. I don’t like Chinese food, but I don’t write articles trying to prove it doesn’t exist.

So my unsolicited advice to women in the workplace is this. When faced with sexism or ageism or lookism or even really aggressive Buddhism, ask yourself the following question: ‘Is this person in between me and what I want to do?’ If the answer is no, ignore it and move on. Your energy is better used doing your work, and outpacing people that way. Then, when you’re in charge, don’t hire the people who were jerky to you. If the answer is yes, you have a more difficult road ahead of you.

I suggest you model your strategy after the old Sesame Street film piece ‘Over! Under! Through!’ (If you’re under forty you might not remember this film. It taught the concepts of ‘over, under, and ‘through’ by filming toddlers crawling around in an abandoned construction site. They don’t show it anymore because someone has since realized that’s nuts.) If your boss is a jerk, try to find someone above or around your boss who is not a jerk. If you’re lucky, your workplace will have a neutral proving ground—like the rifle range or the car sales total board or the SNL read-through. If so, focus on that.

Again, don’t waste your energy trying to educate or change opinions. Go ‘Over! Under! Through!’ and opinions will change organically when you’re the boss. Or they won’t. Who cares? Do your thing and don’t care if they like it.”

(via changetheratio)

Filed under tina fey

2,345 notes

Reading is everything. Reading makes me feel like I’ve accomplished something, learned something, become a better person. Reading makes me smarter. Reading gives me something to talk about later on. Reading is the unbelievably healthy way my attention deficit disorder medicates itself. Reading is escape, and the opposite of escape; it’s a way to make contact with reality after a day of making things up, and it’s a way of making contact with someone else’s imagination after a day that’s all too real. Reading is grist. Reading is bliss.
Nora Ephron (via austinkleon)

(via austinkleon)

Filed under norah ephron reading

93 notes

newyorker:


Similar to “The Newsroom,” “Sports Night” set its action within the production of a television show, a nightly sports-highlights broadcast. It was modelled on ESPN’s “SportsCenter,” which had made Olbermann a star, but which he quit in 1997, in one of the many bitter departures that would come to mark his career. “Sports Night” also introduced America to Sorkin’s distinct verbal rhythms, and retains a following.

Ian Crouch looks at video clips of Sorkin’s “Sports Night,” and analyzes how the show defined the “Sorkin Sound,” and gained a cult following: http://nyr.kr/LjHBKf

newyorker:

Similar to “The Newsroom,” “Sports Night” set its action within the production of a television show, a nightly sports-highlights broadcast. It was modelled on ESPN’s “SportsCenter,” which had made Olbermann a star, but which he quit in 1997, in one of the many bitter departures that would come to mark his career. “Sports Night” also introduced America to Sorkin’s distinct verbal rhythms, and retains a following.

Ian Crouch looks at video clips of Sorkin’s “Sports Night,” and analyzes how the show defined the “Sorkin Sound,” and gained a cult following: http://nyr.kr/LjHBKf

Filed under sports night aaron sorkin

142 notes

heckyeahlucilleballilovelucy:

Lucille Ball and Judy Garland photographed in 1943
Stars like Greer Garson, James Cagney, Lucille Ball, Fred Astaire, Judy Garland, Kathryn Grayson, Paul Henreid, Betty Hutton, Harpo Marx, Dick Powell and more, all went on the road by train, as a group, to promote the selling of war bonds during WWII 

heckyeahlucilleballilovelucy:

Lucille Ball and Judy Garland photographed in 1943

Stars like Greer Garson, James Cagney, Lucille Ball, Fred Astaire, Judy Garland, Kathryn Grayson, Paul Henreid, Betty Hutton, Harpo Marx, Dick Powell and more, all went on the road by train, as a group, to promote the selling of war bonds during WWII 

44 notes

Five minutes with the average voter.

Josh Lyman:
Because sixty-eight percent think we give too much in foreign aid, and fifty-nine percent think it should be cut.
Will Bailey:
You like that stat?
Josh:
I do.
Will:
Why?
Josh:
Because nine percent think it's too high and SHOULDN'T be cut! Nine percent of respondents could not fully get their arms around the question. There should be another box you can check for, "I have utterly no idea what you're talking about. Please, God, don't ask for my input."

Filed under west wing josh lyman